The Nemstsov murder - 03/06/2015

CANVAS and Right Sector trail in the murder of Nemtsov

Fort Russ,

6 March, 2015

Translated by Kristina Rus

Originally published: March 1, 2015

The Serbian trail, stretching from the terrorist attack in Kharkov to the murder of Boris Nemtsov, stands out from under the carpet too much to ignore it. NGO CANVAS, grown from the Serbian maidan organization "Otpor!", is very heavily involved in Ukraine and now have seriously taken over Russia.

The murder of Boris Nemtsov, whose corpse was found almost at the walls of the Kremlin, is in itself a very extraordinary event for Russia. Never in the Russian Federation there was a murder of a former member of the government, Deputy Prime Minister, a politician who was welcome at the White House and who spoke before the U.S. Congress. The body of this politician, deliberately executed in direct line of sight from the Kremlin, calls for a very serious approach to the murder, the forces behind it and the effects. A serious approach to the situation forces us to carefully consider all the versions of what happened.

On February 28, 2015, on the program "Norkin's List" (NTV) a well-known political analyst Sergey Kurginyan expressed some thoughts about the murder of Nemtsov:

In particular, Kurginyan said:

"...Yarosh [the leader of the Right Sector", a radical Ukrainian organization - Ruskom] cooperates with CANVAS, it's a Serbian - American organization for the implementation of the "orange revolutions", this organization organized Maidan [in Kiev - Ruskom] and everything else. Now CANVAS is heavily involved in Russia. Boris Nemtsov, unfortunately, said some strange words on February 10th, that he is afraid he will be killed by the authorities [which turned to be a fantasy of the editors - KR]. Immediately after that, the topic was discussed by Yarosh and representatives of CANVAS. Then the representatives of CANVAS came to Russia, among those representatives there is a man, a Serb, "Atsa" is his nickname (Alexander "Atsa" Kazun, lives in the USA, works for CANVAS - Ruskom), who was apprehended for the Kharkov explosion, and then he was released by Turchynov. Isn't this interesting? Do we really want to know who is behind the murders?"


If we discard all versions except for the most probable - the murder of Nemtsov was supposed to destabilize the situation in Russia before the opposition march on March 1, this destabilization is most needed by the Ukrainian radical organizations, and therefore, Yarosh and the Right Sector. The situation on the fronts of Donbass is such that defeated on all fronts and expelled from Debaltsevo Ukrainian military will not soon recover from the damage and most likely will not be able to recover at all. In this situation a strategically winning solution for the Ukrainian radicals and their Western friends and curators is only a serious destabilization of the situation in Russia.

The focus of certain forces on the course of civil and political terror in Ukraine is evident in the terrorist act that took place in Kharkov on February 23, killing three people and injuring about ten. Ukrainian media of course, immediately, before the start of investigation, rushed to blame the "separatists", "vatniki" and the Russian security services. There is no faith that the Ukrainian investigation will find the perpetrators, just as there is no hope for the investigation of Maidan snipers, which has taken already a year to no result. But if we think about who benefits from the terror in Ukraine, it is clear that neither Russia nor DPR/LPR can benefit from it.

The terror only benefits Ukrainian radicals and their curators, who thus wish to strengthen the anti-Russian and anti-Donbass mood in the society. 

What was extraordinary about the Kharkov explosion?

"...two fighters from the special police battalion group "Kharkov-1" and a girl from the Right Sector, who showed negligence when handling explosives, injuring themselves, were supposed to be evacuated by the group consisting of four people. Strange activity of this group attracted the attention of the police, and the four were arrested. During a search of their minivan it turned out that, that it was unclear how they were going to evacuate their own, when the car was packed full of weapons, including automatic mounted grenade launcher AGS-30 of Russian production. The senior of the group turned out to be a U.S. citizen, presumably, of Serbian decent, Alexander Kazun nicknamed "Atsa" permanently residing in Washington, DC. Place of work: NGO CANVAS. Mr. Kazun was immediately released on the personal order from the Secretary of the Council of National Security and Defense of Ukraine, Aleksandr  Turchinov."


A capture of a foreign citizen at the place of a terrorist attack looks very suspicious. Even more suspicious is the fact of the release of this citizen, Alexander Kazun, on the order of Alexander Turchynov, who has serious ties with the elites in the USA. And it becomes even more suspicious after understanding what is the NGO CANVAS. Here's what William Engdahl wrote about it on January 7, 2014 in the article"American NGO involved in the protests in Ukraine":

"CANVAS: the Belgrade U.S.-funded training organization is behind the carefully organized protests in Kiev. The recent protests in Ukraine stink of an attempt to destabilize the government of Yanukovych, organized from abroad "

After the events in Kharkov the representatives of this organization, engaged in the export of "revolutions" ended up in Moscow. In addition, NGO CANVAS originated from the "bulldozer revolution" in Belgrade in 2000, which overthrew Slobodan Milosevic. The Serbs, who at the time experienced all the "charms" of the coups organized by the West,warned the citizens of Ukraine about those consequences which follow the "peaceful protest against the bloody tyrant" under the cries of "they're just children!":

"I live in Belgrade, Serbia, and events in Ukraine remind me of the events in Serbia in the late 1990s and in 2000. In 2000 Western-paid opposition overthrew Slobodan Milosevic, all to our great joy and our great hopes for the future, just because we were tired of the difficult life (or what we perceived as a difficult life at that time) and, in fact, we were naive and duped by Western media (as well as you are today, but let me continue, I will explain this later). Later we realized that it does not work like that - the West did not give us money, did not give us investments, in essence, the West and the European Union did not act like friends at all. Better life never came, and in fact things have gotten worse.

Now, attention! The same people who lied to us and made our "democratic revolution", are now making YOURS - NGO called "Otpor!" ("Resistance") in the 1990s, now known as the "CANVAS" - "The Center for the applied nonviolent action and strategies". Also the usual names and agencies in this show: USAID, Freedom House, The National Endowment for Democracy, George Soros... See for yourself. These are the same people - the oligarchs in Serbia now. They are trained by the CIA, and do their work in Ukraine (and other countries), yourYanukovych even banned some of the many very interesting articles, Ukraine is mentioned in almost every one of them"

Unfortunately, the Ukrainians did not heed the calls of the Serbian people and decided by their bitter experience to test the heavy forces of democracy and breathe the free air of Maidan. In this they were helped by many experts from Serbia (and not only), in particular Marko Ivkovic, the head of the above-mentioned Serbian organization "Otpor!" This was reported by Oleg Tsarev on December 1, 2013 at his page on Facebook:

"The day before yesterday my friend was flying to Ukraine, and in his companion he recognized the well-known organizer of coups and revolutions, Marko Ivkovic. He became famous as the founder of the Serbian "Otpor", then there were Georgian "Kmara" and Ukrainian "Pora". Marco tried to organize something similar in Russia, but was extradited and banned from entry. Was in Kyrgyzstan in 2010, when President Bakiyev was ousted there. Now Maidan is in experienced and financially secure hands. Americans do not spare any money on Ivakovic - not so long ago on his projects in Ukraine the National Democratic Institute of the United States provided $1,200,000".

In 2012, Marko Ivkovic already worked in Ukraine at the National Democratic Institute of USA, operated in contact with the party "Front of Changes" of Arseniy Yatsenyuk, created a public organization "OPORA" to count the votes at elections. Was the unofficial head of the electoral headquarters of Yatsenyuk. The Ukrainian media already in early 2012 hypothesized that Ivkovic was busy preparing "Maidan-2".

In 2013, right before the aggravation of the situation, Ivkovic arrived to Ukraine on November 29, which was reported by Oleg Tsarev. Next, let's give a word to the Ukrainian media (publication date September 12, 2013):

"On the eve of the "Popular Assembly," Arseniy Yatsenyuk and opposition leaders met with Marko Ivkovic - one of the members of the National Democratic Institute, USA. This was reported by the media, citing sources close to Yatsenyuk. The meeting was attended also by Fink Bryne (Gomez) - U.S. citizen, employee of the Agency for International Development, USA. Both U.S. citizens, known as consultants for colored revolutions, came to Ukraine a few weeks ago (Fink Bryne - on October 28). [the spelling of the name may be different in English as it is a translation from Russian - KR]

Now the details of that meeting became known. In particular, it is reported that Marko Ivkovic offered to A. Yatsenyuk, V. Klitschko and O. Tiagnybok to proclaim on the Maidan on Sunday during the "Popular Assembly" a "Manifesto", according to which to announce the transition of power into the hands of the provisional (until the elections) "people's government".

Next was a matter of technique and concerted action. The "People's government" was supposed to move into the building of the Kiev city administration to use the existing phones of government communications, contact law enforcement agencies and the army calling for support. And also - and this is, perhaps, the most important thing - to contact the embassies of the European countries and the USA with the request for recognition. When it comes to their interests, the United States and Europe, do not waste time with recognition. According to the source, the American Embassy has already prepared the official response with the approval of the actions of the opposition"

Now we know that the January - February events of 2014 in Kiev took place according to the scenario written in December 2013, and therefore, reality confirms the involvement of Serbs and Americans in Kiev events, and the high profile of the organizers of Euromaidan.

Serbian - American consultants of Kiev Euromaidan do not hesitate to use established and successful templates, instructions and practices. For example, the leaflets, which were first used in Belgrade in 2000, then in Cairo in 2011, and then in Kiev in 2013-2014:

NGO CANVAS at first glance at its website seems like a reputable international organization which strongly emphasizes its non-violent character. Now we understand what "non-violent" actions the employee of CANVAS Alexander Kazun, nicknamed "Atsa" was engaged in in Kharkov on February 23 in the car with explosives and automatic grenade launchers and what actions he may have been engaged in in Moscow.

CANVAS operates in Europe, in America, in Africa, and Asia. Tremendous scope for a modest Serbian organization, isn't it?

Everything falls into place, when we see, which organizations CANVAS is cooperating with in "developing long-term strategies related to the production of knowledge, tools, and studies of the global nonviolent struggle and the formation of a network of researchers related to the topic of non-violent resistance and strategies". This is the Air Force Academy of Colorado, the John Hopkins University, and Columbia University. The website of CANVAS shows links to the sites of organizations such as the Institute of Albert Einstein, Freedom House and others, not less "friendly" to Russia:

Words are given to us to conceal our thoughts, and websites - to hide the true extent and details of the activities of organizations. So the sterile website CANVAS will not reveal the real information about their activities. But this data is provided by Wikileaks and other resources.




For example, there is a correspondence between the staff of the American organization Stratfor (private intelligence company of the United States, which is also called "the shadow CIA"), in which "CANVAS" and its leaders are very highly rated:


"This is an impressive group. They come in, operate in a country, and try to topple its regime. When used properly, they are stronger than an aircraft battle group."

In response to the mention of “aircraft battle group", Vice President of Stratfor, Fred Burton, sarcastically said that perhaps they should be sent to Iran.

Another letter said that "this organization (CANVAS) gets a lot of American money ...I spoke with some people who lobbied for them (CANVAS) to get more money". 

It is further specified that the Serbian organization "Otpor!" was funded, in particular, by Freedom House, the International Republican Institute, The Open Society Institute, USAID and the U.S. Institute for Peace. And it is indicated that CANVAS has financial ties with these organizations.




"Otpor!" and then CANVAS are not only mentioned in the correspondence of Stratfor employees, they also have close ties with Stratfor, Goldman Sachs, and the U.S. government. The wife of the leader of CANVAS worked in Stratfor for one year (from March 2010 to March 2011).

Srdja Popovich, the leader of the CANVAS

To put it briefly, CANVAS helps Stratfor in executing the color revolutions, overthrowing any leader hostile to the United States. This is what, according to Wikileaks, the US elite valued in Srdja Popovic and his "Otpor". 


In another letter dated March 2010 Stuart Burton said that CANVAS “is trying to get rid of Chavez,” referring to the late President Hugo Chavez. In 2007, the CANVAS tried to overthrow Chavez with trained activists.


In conclusion we can say that the activists of Serbian "Otpor" in their work used (and use) the models of Gene Sharp, the leading expert on the so-called "non-violent regime change".


How non-violent are these methods, you can evaluate, judging how Gene Sharp participated in the events in Riga in 1990, advising "Sajudis" (nationalist anti-soviet Latvian organization), and that snipers from "Sajudis" shot (and killed) the demonstrators and the police with the aim to destabilize the Baltic States and cause the collapse of the USSR. These are the "non-violent" methods used in his time by Gene Sharp. Such methods are used by his followers from CANVAS, blowing up rallies in Kharkov and killing politicians in Moscow. Don't you think this version seems more than logical?

For Russia today a new complex phase began, in which the country can win, and therefore survive only if Russian patriots and responsible citizens will understand the situation in all its complexity and tragedy. For further detailed analysis please see Friend: http://friend.livejournal.com/1762463.html (Russian)

What do the Banderite and Nemtsov's memorial rallies have in common?

Привезли его домой - оказался он живой? Бандеровские лозунги в центре Москвы.

"Heroes Don't Die" (in Ukrainian) - a banderite slogan in Moscow, March 1st, 2015

 

Fort Russ,

6 March, 2015

Translated by Kristina Rus

How do you like this picture? The whole point of the event in one slogan! The right words and the right language. Not convinced? Then look at more:



Here's another photo from the rally. "Heroes don't die." Where have I seen it? Aha!


A march in memory of Stepan Bandera was held in Kiev

And here's another:


Procession in support of the heroes of the ATO

And more:


Torchlight procession and march in honor of the 72nd anniversary of the UPA in Kiev

I think, that's plenty of examples. Interesting, who in Russia do they want to sell this picture of a memorial procession to?

Am I the only one who thinks, that CANVAS which is tasked to organize Maidan in Moscow is stupidly cutting corners and copying? Even too lazy to come up with an original slogan...

Professional killer comments on the Nemtsov murder

Профессиональный киллер прокомментировал убийство Немцова

Fort Russ,

6 March, 2015

 [Excerpts from the article]

The former professional killer Aleksey Sherstobitov who is serving a prison term for the twelve murders and attempts, told Gazeta.ru journalists about his opinion concerning the killers’ professionalism, their use of various ammunition batches, and why Anna Duritskaya was not harmed.

Concerning weapon used in the murder: “How do you know it was a PM [Makarov pistol]? The same ammunition is also used by the APS [Stechkin automatic pistol, with a 20-round magazine and capable of automatic fire]?

On the use of different ammunition batches: “If you are trying to throw off the investigation, using different munitions is dumb, because the barrel rifling and the extractor will leave identical markings on the bullets and the casings. Moreover, it’s dumb to mix ammunition batches because even during the Soviet era it could have been quickly figured out. It will only help the courts, because if they find similar ammunition from the same batches  at your home, it will be additional evidence against you. It’s another story if the killer was collecting ammunition from whatever he had available”.

“A professional killer will always have a choice of weapon, but obviously he did not have that choice during the murder.”

On why Duritskaya was left alive: “The weapon may have jammed, the shooter may have gotten confused, maybe he wanted to get away as quickly as possible. Maybe he ran out of ammunition. An experienced shooter for whom weapons are his profession would hardly fire that many times.”

Concerning the motives and the party commissioning the crime: “The killer could have been acting on his own initiative, and Duritskaya may be hiding something. We can also assume, due to its brazenness and lack of thinking it through, the Caucasus variant. These guys always use the first available chance. Just look at how the Chechens take out their enemies. They want everyone to know they don’t care how and where.”

On the site of the murder: “It’s one of the worst spots to choose for a murder. If you are trying to make a show out of it, shoot him in public, or in a restaurant. Or use a more powerful weapon.” 

On the timing: “It’s unlikely that the killing was connected to the approaching march. These days intimidation of this sort does not work, so it would give only additional fodder for discussion. In my view he was not a politician who could influence anything. Many have forgotten about him. There are other, more bright stars, among the opposition.”

On the ease of killing Nemtsov: “He was not hiding, he was not using personal security, he felt that he was not in any kind of danger. Politicians are of course, people, and we have to start with that. Many of them forget that little detail and think they are untouchable. But God will sooner or later make everyone equal! These unpleasant photographs, with uncomfortable and ugly poses, the rolled up shirt, the blood and death, that’s the sight of body and soul being separated.”

Concerning the possibility that Nemtsov was murdered to destabilize Russia: “It’s already not very calm. It would have been far more effective to open fire on the demonstration or shoot a genuinely important political figure  but, thank God, nobody will go that far!”

J.Hawk’s Comment: Given that the killers were not “professionals”, it’s entirely possible that he was shot before the Kremlin because that’s where he happened to be that evening. He was beign shadowed over the course of one day, the killers were probably on a schedule of some kind, and besides, longer surveillance might have attracted attention. The bridge at 11:30pm was the only spot that was relatively empty, unpopulated, and without police presence. The only alternative was to wait for him in front of his home, but there was likely no place there for the killer to linger at without being noticed.